I can describe the final image as something like this–
The final image is both big and small; wide and skinny, Simultaneously; creating a 5th indescribable image– Through that image, can we choose to focus on wide or skinny as well as big or small, changing the form of the image (with continuity where the image emerges from)–
Okay; so now we have said it in qualities– But lets talk about narrative– Narrative would be like diagonal relationship between this arrangement
Big
Wide skinny
small
The qualities that these truly are, become definition; by the other qualities working in relationship to each other to form the narrative of the focus– The narrative between these qualities creates the characters that represent the story playing out between them–
Now; with stories each of these qualities become richer; each quality represents some aspect of the truth of the nature of the situation–
King
Foolish magician
lover
The archetypes need not be extreme in terms of opposing each other; rather the story they uphold must be extreme in its opposing– Here, the king finds power with the magician, finds wisdom in the fool, and finds mercy in the lover– The lover finds, technique with the magician, pleasure with the fool, and command of the heart with the king– of course, this could be infinitely more in depth given the medium of the materials used to express the relationships–
More importantly, what I have said has not really been aimed at your heart; and thus cannot be the image– The king archetypes means nothing if the form of it does not move your heart and your focus–
Leave a Reply