The Rites Of Shambhala–

Standard

When we find the true name of a being or the hidden order of their stars; we are able to invoke a mental relationship that immerses us into a new relationship with everything–
That is, when we find the governing order of a being and call forth its presence, we are able to change the flow of thought to give rise to a manifestation that expresses that being–
Much like, if were vast enough to hold onto different stars in a galaxy without disturbing their orbit, and finding out body stretched and shaped to their whim; so to, if we hold onto their governing orders
And allow their presence to give form to that which arises in front of us–

The minor rites of Shambhala, will be different in experience than the major–

The minor rites, One attempts to call forth and experiences it; only as an energetic level; as mental phantoms, as a physical presence, as a part of reality but not the reality in it of itself–
Very important is the nature of meaning; not everything is speaking to the orbit of the stars.. It is like talking to another human from a different country you are unfamiliar with; there might be some communication,
There might even feel like a significant understanding, and yet the amount of interaction is not significant enough to completely change the meaning of everything in front of you; to allow reality to become so fully
Translucent– And further, even this type of experience, can obscure those things that have yet to come into the relationship of meaningful definition–

The major rites of Shambhala–

One may walk to Shambhala– One may know Shambhala’s true location, which is tied to its true orbits– It is not a matter of, being able to transcend this reality to another; but to know this reality as that reality–
To know division and unity as the same; and to know unity and division in its difference– to find unity in its differences, and division in its unity–

The Chakra’s and third eye in practical use–

Standard

Everything we experiences calls up conceptualized notions, from these words to pain in the body– That is a pain in the body calls up all sorts of associations, just like the words I am writing here; and yet, often we are not made very conscious of these conceptualizations– Are you thinking about what each words conjures up in the mind? or are you read this straight through until it appears to make sense to you? How is it making sense to you? Are you imagining what I am saying? What is there yet to imagine?

These hidden concepts hide those ways in which we can and cannot relate to things; they govern our logic, and yet hide the premises upon which our logic arises from; and thus also hide what our mind is open and closed to in awareness–

The chakra’s as well as other systems of relation, are designations and designs meant to dissolve these modalities; but first must be constructed mentally as a modality in the first place–
That is, first we treat them as real things.. As we treat them as real things we build and emerge a system of relations in which to work with.. giving them a mental reality which transcends the modalities which appear to exist within them–

As we are able to think of how things in our reality relate differently; we are able to open up new chakra’s or new meta levels of relation which bring unification of everything at different levels, as well as bring them into separate categories of distinction; and yet at the highest levels become indivisible or light level thinking–

As this occurs, we are able to bring those hidden conceptualizations and associations into conscious awareness; and we are able to use the minds eye to further illuminate our unconscious thinking by changing the relationships into different forms of revelation– Much like recalling a certain formulaic movie (boy meets girl) and thinking of it in an entirely different movie (where boy still meets girl) allowing us to take the same “energy” and bring clarity to it by entirely different forms of definition–

That is to say, we use these types of frameworks to construct an approach to reality that allows our conceptualizations to diminish their influence in how we must think of things, and how things must relate.. in order to free up the movement of our mind, and yet not only free up the movement in our mind, but to remove those ingrained experiences and past traumas that cause us to repeatedly experience reality in the same way that occurred the same causes of issues–

This however, does bring us into magical thinking; why? Because in order to orientate ourselves to those arising manifestations (increasingly clear governing “strange attractors”), we must bring in certain place holders to represent certain aspects of “dimensionless” reality which have a very clear influence on the nature of our being; and yet, have no clear definition in the objective reality– Thus we emerge a metaphorical reality, which is both not as real as it is thought of, but very real as an existence–

Bilocation

Standard

It is in a sense; understanding the current moment in multiple ways; but bringing those multiple ways into one formation– When it is experienced as this one formation, it has consequences of projecting a form of the self into the experience of others– The presence is neither here nor there, but means here and there– More so, this is already going on; but the fact that our presence is not recognized as being elsewhere simultaneously, it is like not consciously recognizing the meaning in a way that brings us into the formation of those details–

That is, you are already here; but are not conscious of being here to know the consequences of such–

It can be seen as going to a party, you arrive to this party and see all the details of this party– Now, the details; start morphing into new definitions, but those new definitions carry with them a certain relationship to all that is going on around you in the party– So now maybe we are in a room, but all the details of the room are arranged in a manner that reflect what is going on in the party.. in some ways metaphorical, but down to the detail– However you interact with the definitions of this room, comes into definition at the party– This room is kind of like a gate way, because; now let us say you are also at some other event or even with a simple one on one with someone else– Suddenly, the room changes to reflect the interactions of both events.. you are both there, and not there; both completely aware in a way of being there, but also completely aware of another way being elsewhere–

Further on this; once such a thing is established; you can be fully immersed in one experience, and understand completely the full immersion of the other experience– There are consequences to your personality however, because you are not simply acting upon one place, you are acting in “balance” of multiple places; the choices you make in one, are aligned with the choices you are making in another even though they may appear completely different; however, these choices can be aligned to one in the same depending on the quality formation– Which is like the quality of visions of the third eye, but on a different scale which is the scale of being–

5 Nations

Standard

There are 5 nations; each nation has some leading body, be it council or king– If one of the leading bodies dies, the other leading bodies die– The personality of the leading body, reflects that of the body it leads; the quality of life of its followers, directly affect the quality of life of its leaders; however, the quality of life of its leaders, also directly affects the quality of life of its followers– Within this, there is an aspect of nature that is not governed by nations; it is called nature; nature is led by 5 other nations seemingly disconnect from the world of these 5 nations; or appear to these 5 nations as nature, just as these 5 nations appear to the other 5 nations as nature–

The prosperity of 5 nations is dependent upon the prosperity of the other 5 nations; even if these 5 nations only know each other in forms they do not recognize as another 5 nations–

As any one of the 5 nations change in balance and quality, so to does the nature that the other 5 must balance with; and as they change, so to must the 5 nations reflect the change in balance–

A leader of a nation, may be served by the entire nation in order to assure a quality life; which affects the personality of the leader to govern in ways that bring greater quality to each individuals part in the collective; and yet, allowing each individual to increasingly increase the quality of serving the leader– A perpetual fountain–

A leader, may serve the nations quality of life; and find their quality of life naturally increasing in quality by seeming synchronicity; the same fountain principle in a different form and definition–

A council may find it the same way; and yet the counsel might be more diverse in its expression of personality in relation to its nation; conflicts may be more expressed between them, but if it were a singular leader, these conflicts would be something of its own conscience and not outwardly manifested in the same manner–

A major change in the counsel; will make a major change in the nation– A major change in the nation, will create a major change in the way the nations must cooperatively relate if such is the chosen way, or becomes the chosen way– this would affect their relationship with nature; which on the flip side, is natures relationship to the other 5 nations; the other 5 nations would have to change their relationship to nature, which in effect is nature changing their relationship to the changing relations within the nations–

A change in any nation; is essentially a change in relation to another; from general attitude, to direct exchanges and diplomacy– Every change in each nation, is reflected in the other nation; and each change in each nation is reflected in the nations relations to each other; and each change in each relations to each other, is reflected in their balance with nature, and each change in the balance of nature, is reflected as a change, in the relations between the other 5 nations; and each change between the other 5 nations relations, are reflective of the a change in each of the 5 nations– A change in each of the other 5 nations, is reflected in the relationship between the leader and its followers; and a change between the leader and its followers, is reflective of the quality of life of each individual involved; and the quality of life of each individual of life is how they relate to the whole which is reflective of their relationship to all of it, as it is reflected in every relationship–